role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In accordance with the EPA fee schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be meant for redistribution around the internet or for commercial purposes.
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal and traffic case information during the general district courts to the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been on the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be considered, however, we have been crystal clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, subject to availability of vacancy issue on the approval from the competent authority. Read more
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders holding in view that on the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel for that respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order regarding costs. Read more
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which includes eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.
VI) The petitioner is guiding the bars considering that arrest, investigation from the case is complete, he is not any more needed to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him behind the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no useful purpose.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration via the Court under Article 184 (three), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much a lot easier access to your public to tactic the superior courts along with the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by regulation." It can be properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, read more the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.